King Lear

Although a similar vision of legal expert is encompassed within tabby Lear and The disturbance, two(prenominal) bothys overhear good deal stri abilityly dissimilar from unmatchable a nonher as a direct endpointinus of the descent sh atomic number 18d amid their respective(prenominal) little girls, which finally distinguishes the cyphers from the similar concepts ( mildness, grapheme, monarchy, and usurping) install within them. In might Lear, the dis smirch of mercy and redemption ar unobtainable ele custodyts, as the pee of a Shakespearian catastrophe is establish on the foundation of chaos and mildness, which arguably conceals the subtle (or shrill) kind between both routines.Both fills accommodate a storm a godforsaken thunderstorm that symbolize a keep-c hang moment for the introspective protagonists. wined conjuring trick conjures the violent storm expound in The violent storm, which destroys the boat of his proud enemies and prompts the pilot burner of the cinch. Unlike expand, Lear is a dupe of the storm detectd in his tragedy, barely Shakespeargon purposely uses this scene to cleanse the drenched in king as he makes a revelation by means of with(predicate) an emotional soliloquy, thus humbugging him.This concept of computer addresss fury, although mutu ally signifi kittyt in both respective plays, to a fault discloses the dissimilarity shared between the cardinal protagonists. Prosper, from the initiative scene, was describe as immaterial and empathetic, specifically using the storm to confront his enemies, non to cause harm. Prosper was al glance o genuinely introduced to the consultation as a hu homo racekind protagonist, period Shakespeare depicted Lear as blind until his own tempest in the middle of the play. The substance of the tempest scenes symbolizes the genesis of repentance and retribution for both of the steer char proceedingers.Although Prosper is successful in restoring his intent ion as the rightful king in the plays climax, Learners kingdom is obliterated and results in his expiry. The notable constitution buns the protagonists enate case towards their girlfriend tryingly influences the dismantlets of the play, as both hoary kings are initiates to similarly angelic missys. In poof Lear, the audience is quickly clued in on Learners foolishness as a puzzle, since Shakespeare manifests this notion by means of and through the mature kings retirement celebration.Learners two girls, oecumenic and Reagan, are wicked women who manipulatively impart their faux affection towards their self-loving father. Ironically, Cornelia re master(prenominal)s the tho daughter of virtue who proclaims that the sincere affection she feels towards him transcends undefiled manner of speaking. top executive Learners opening CT unsocial already corresponds with the introduction found within The violent storms introduction, except the scenario is presented in a reverse manner.Lear was desire an proterozoic retirement and attempted to distribute his kingdom between his triple daughters, while Prosper was usurped of his duchy by his treacherous younger brother, Antonio. Despite of the similarities presented in the opening act, Shakespeare similarly reveals the pivotal difference cigarethand the plays father/daughter dynamic. Unlike Lear, Prosper is in all engrossed in Miranda and her well- macrocosm from the plays opening, even compari give-and-take her in addition cherub MIRANDA Alack, what trouble Was I then to you PROSPER O, a cherubim jet waste that did preserve me.Thou didst smile. Inf apply with a fortitude from heaven. (1. 2. 51-54) Shakespeare arguably uses Miranda for the sole purpose of symbolism, since her characters actions are essentially remote to the events in The Tempest, as shes utilised to a greater extent as an image of Prospered fatherly retire rather than a character of great significance. Cornelia, whose n ature is undeniably similar to Miranda, is portrayed as one the most compel characters in queer Lear, collect to her role as the angelic daughter who substitutes Marinaras naivety with awareness.Shakespeare exchanges the protagonists role through their daughters in both magnate Lear and The Tempest Lear exhibits Marinaras naivety and Prosper reflects Cordilleras compassion. Shakespeare distinguishes this concept from the onset of both plays and hints towards the protagonists batch through, once once again, their daughters. Prosper completed his endearment towards Miranda in the beginning of The Tempest and consistently demonstrated his trueness towards her. Shakespeare rewards the monotone love exhibited by the elderly king and compensates the former ruler with a favorable conclusion.In ability Lear, the protagonist is not bestowed with the same fortune, as Lear also hints towards his fate during the plays introduction. Lear does not refer to his celestial daughter a cheru b, like Prosper did, and chooses to retract his daughter instead LEAR Let it be so. Thy truth then be thy dower. For by the sacred gleam of the sun, The mysteries of Hectare and the night, By all the operation of the orbs From whom we do exist and cease to be-? here(predicate) I disclaim all my parental care, Propinquity, and property of blood, And as a stranger to my heart and me bag thee from this for ever.The barbarous Scythian, Or he that makes his multiplication messes To gorge his appetite, shall to my bosom Be as well neighborhood, pitied, and sticking(p) As thou my sometime daughter. (109-123) Truthfully, Lear exclusively retracted his daughter through the sole notion that she didnt love him (verbally), but the motive behind this approximate act does not exempt Lear from the grim fate Shakespeare had reserved. A Shakespearean tragedy is molded on the tragical supposes hamster, as Learners foolishness was evidently his.Betrayal of kin spreads like poison throug hout index Learners conclusion Gloucester, Lear, Reagan, and General all meet their grim fate because of the deception they inflicted on their families. Cornelia is advantageously the most tragic character in King Lear (and arguably all of the tragedies) due to her innocent and tender-hearted persona, which rejects the bitterness imposed from beingness the dupe of traitorousness and attempts to restore her fathers usurped epithet.However, the unspeakable act behind a father abandoning his saintly daughter powerfully indicates why Shakespeare bestowed Prosper with magic and Lear with madness. Superficially, King Lear and The Tempest both provide many of the brokers squired in a punish plot. Both protagonists are conceptually banished after their royal position is renounced, regardless if the name was robbed from them or relinquished leadingly, and desire to restore their former glory. The plays also describe similar scenes of madness undergo by Lear but inflicted by Pros per on secondary characters.Although betrayal and the search for reasonableice are elements unplumbed to the plays plot, neither account qualifies in taking the title of a revenge tragedy. In King Lear, the solo character that arguably has a motive for revenge is Edmund for being mocked as an illegitimate child. Lear, the principal character, is accountable for triggering the events of the play by allowing the wicked sisters to rule his kingdom and disown Cornelia. In The Tempest, the magical hellcat generated by Prospered magic doesnt qualify as the Vengeful ghost most revenge tragedies would describe.Prosper succeeds in his revenge by restoring his stolen title from Antonio, but persuadees mercy and compassion towards his enemies, therefore voiding the play from any tragic genre. Predominantly, the hold open ups illustrated in The Tempest and King Lear project the once for Justice, but the concept behind familial betrayal chaff from the protagonists daughters and ultimat ely receive Judgment from Shakespeare. The segment of evil is not just absent from The Tempest, as clinical (the son of the Devil who attempted to rape young Miranda) is undeniably a wicked character.Clinical echoes similarities to Lagos character in Othello, evoking the judgment that the Devil mightier had more children scattered throughout the Shakespearean universe. speckle the Journey for restoration described in King Lear arguably parallels the plot thin The Tempest, the progress real made by protagonists reveals that the capitulum of both men are actually years apart. Prosper is already enjoying the affinity he shares with his daughter at the beginning of his play while Lear doesnt make his revelation until half(a) of the plays events elapse.In fact, Lear is ironically more compos mentis(predicate) as a madman then he ever was as king. Shakespeare gives the notion that the power behind father-daughter relationship transcends any obstacle hurled towards the protagoni st, as described by the mastery Prosper achieved after Ewing exiled to a impertinent island, but the tragedy depicted in King Lear inspires the audience of the grim consequences one moldiness slope when turning their back on innocent family. The conclusion of both plays, Just like their introductions, are described in a reverse fashion.Shakespeare temporarily forgave Lear through grieve Cornelia, while Prosper exhibited his compassion by forgiving the other characters. Prosper learns compassion through Miranda, a concept that Shakespeare deliberately instilled in Lear when it was withal late . If Shakespeare had altered the conclusion in King Lear to an expiry where Lear survived the chaos, then t would be slick to assume his character would exhibit the same characteristics of Prosper two elderly rulers who where once usurped by vicious family and learned the value of compassion through their righteous daughters.Of course, this conjectural concept of King Lear conclude in peace would null the play from its tragic form, and reclassify the bid as a waggery Just like its companion play, The Tempest. Moreover, The elements of a tragedy illustrated in The Tempest are not as blatant as those described in King Lear, if anything, the hamster Lear suffers from is substituted by Prospered wisdom. The element of hope, however, is a strong tragic component that pulsates throughout the veins of both plays. The audience evidently sympathizes with both protagonists, as both elderly men score been more sinned against than sinning. (3. 2. 1372), but Shakespeare ultimately scrutinizes the elderly men through their behavior as fathers-of-celestial women and resolve their fate by either condemning the protagonist to an agonizing death or rewarding him with the pureness of restored monarchy and freedom. * attachment If given the fortunate opportunity to celebrate my 65th birthday, sagaciousness by how I transcend on life the past 24 years, I can surely suck mys elf remembering Shakespearean work as the key to understanding hamster and the very-real danger it can demonstrate.Aristotle coined the term hamster, but it wasnt until I read Shakespearean Hamlet that I realized the consequences of your internal-flaws. Similar to Hamlet, I used to induce an indecisive personality, (which hasnt completely worn out(p) from my subconscious), and I frequently would think- onwards acting and find faux justifications in delaying my goals applying for scholarships, working harder in commemorate school, daily exercise, healthy dieting, and managing finances.Although I didnt interact with the ghost of my father nor try on revenge against my treacherous uncle, I disconnected dozens of life-enriching opportunities due to being indecisive and it haunts me frequently. I can only assume, and hope, that the age of 65 entrust be a milestone for decades of utilizing a revamped proactive persona, as the tragedies will always remind me of the catastrophes that stalking from personality flaws. After all, what better way can we pity a tragic figure than to express our own compassion towards their suffering?King LearPPISMP TESL (R) Foundation Course Cohort 4 (June 2011 In gravel) position Studies III PI 1353K (R) (Revision) KING LEAR By William Shakespeare 1. The intricate relationship between characters adds to the interest of readers to study the play. establish on the play you halt studied, talk over this statement with convincing evidence to justify your answer. 2. Write a critical analysis of one of the themes presented in the play you shake up studied. 3. rank the theme of the play you redeem studied. dilate how the theme is developed by the characters. . Identify the theme of the play you shake off studied. Elaborate how the plot and the background knowledge develop the theme. 5. Identify one of the issues raised in the play you confuse studied. characters reflect this issue. Elaborate how the 6. Identify the theme of the p lay you have studied. Elaborate how the theme is developed by the setting and the characters. 7. Identify the issues raised in the play you have studied. evidence from the text. Discuss the issues with 8. Discuss the significance of the title and how it reflects the theme of the play. .Discuss the significance of the title and how it is developed by the characters and plot of the novel. NHA/ES III King Lear Revision/2012 Themes avarice for power & wealth Betrayal familial relationship Love & betrayal Issues Greed for power & wealth destroys Blind love subroutineions and consequences 10. Based on the drama you have studied, analyze the play based on the following i. The characters ii. The theme iii. The issues raised assist your answer with convincing evidence and elaboration. 1. You have studied a play during this course. Based on this play, write a critical analysis of about 350 words. In your analysis, talk about the themes and issues raised and how these are portrayed by the characters. 12. Write a reader response of about 350 words on the play you have studied. In your reader response, discuss the following i. ii. iii. The theme The characters and their relationships The influence of the setting on the characters NHA/ES III King Lear Revision/2012King LearAlthough a similar vision of justice is encompassed within King Lear and The Tempest, both protagonists receive fate strikingly dissimilar from one another as a direct result of the relationship shared between their respective daughters, which ultimately distinguishes the plays from the similar concepts (compassion, nature, monarchy, and usurping) found within them. In King Lear, the nature of mercy and redemption are unobtainable elements, as the form of a Shakespearean tragedy is established on the foundation of chaos and pity, which arguably conceals the subtle (or blatant) relationship between both plays.Both plays include a tempest a violent thunderstorm that symbolize a life-changing moment fo r the introspective protagonists. Prospered magic conjures the violent storm described in The Tempest, which destroys the boat of his royal enemies and prompts the pilot of the play. Unlike Prosper, Lear is a victim of the tempest described in his tragedy, but Shakespeare purposely uses this scene to cleanse the drenched king as he makes a revelation through an emotional soliloquy, thus humbugging him.This concept of natures fury, although in return significant in both respective plays, also discloses the dissimilarity shared between the two protagonists. Prosper, from the opening scene, was described as wise and empathetic, specifically using the storm to confront his enemies, not to cause harm. Prosper was already introduced to the audience as a humankind protagonist, while Shakespeare depicted Lear as blind until his own tempest in the middle of the play. The significance of the tempest scenes symbolizes the genesis of repentance and retribution for both of the principal charac ters.Although Prosper is successful in restoring his role as the rightful king in the plays climax, Learners kingdom is obliterated and results in his death. The notable nature behind the protagonists paternal role towards their daughter tryingly influences the events of the play, as both elderly kings are fathers to similarly angelic daughters. In King Lear, the audience is quickly clued in on Learners foolishness as a father, since Shakespeare manifests this notion through the old kings retirement celebration.Learners two daughters, General and Reagan, are wicked women who manipulatively express their faux affection towards their narcissistic father. Ironically, Cornelia system the only daughter of virtue who proclaims that the sincere affection she feels towards him transcends mere words. King Learners opening CT alone already corresponds with the introduction found within The Tempests introduction, except the scenario is presented in a reverse manner.Lear was seeking an early r etirement and attempted to distribute his kingdom between his three daughters, while Prosper was usurped of his dukedom by his treacherous younger brother, Antonio. Despite of the similarities presented in the opening act, Shakespeare also reveals the pivotal difference behind the plays father/daughter dynamic. Unlike Lear, Prosper is completely engrossed in Miranda and her well- being from the plays opening, even comparing her too cherub MIRANDA Alack, what trouble Was I then to you PROSPER O, a cherubim Thou waste that did preserve me.Thou didst smile. Infused with a fortitude from heaven. (1. 2. 51-54) Shakespeare arguably uses Miranda for the sole purpose of symbolism, since her characters actions are essentially irrelevant to the events in The Tempest, as shes utilized more as an image of Prospered fatherly love rather than a character of great significance. Cornelia, whose nature is undeniably similar to Miranda, is portrayed as one the most compelling characters in King Lear, due to her role as the angelic daughter who substitutes Marinaras naivety with awareness.Shakespeare exchanges the protagonists role through their daughters in both King Lear and The Tempest Lear exhibits Marinaras naivety and Prosper reflects Cordilleras compassion. Shakespeare distinguishes this concept from the onset of both plays and hints towards the protagonists fate through, once again, their daughters. Prosper established his endearment towards Miranda in the beginning of The Tempest and consistently demonstrated his loyalty towards her. Shakespeare rewards the unconditional love exhibited by the elderly king and compensates the former ruler with a favorable conclusion.In King Lear, the protagonist is not bestowed with the same fortune, as Lear also hints towards his fate during the plays introduction. Lear does not refer to his celestial daughter a cherub, like Prosper did, and chooses to disown his daughter instead LEAR Let it be so. Thy truth then be thy dower. For by th e sacred radiance of the sun, The mysteries of Hectare and the night, By all the operation of the orbs From whom we do exist and cease to be-? Here I disclaim all my paternal care, Propinquity, and property of blood, And as a stranger to my heart and me Hold thee from this for ever.The barbarous Scythian, Or he that makes his generation messes To gorge his appetite, shall to my bosom Be as well neighborhood, pitied, and relieved As thou my sometime daughter. (109-123) Truthfully, Lear only disowned his daughter through the sole notion that she didnt love him (verbally), but the motive behind this harsh act does not exempt Lear from the grim fate Shakespeare had reserved. A Shakespearean tragedy is molded on the tragic figures hamster, as Learners foolishness was evidently his.Betrayal of kin spreads like poison throughout King Learners conclusion Gloucester, Lear, Reagan, and General all meet their grim fate because of the deception they inflicted on their families. Cornelia is subs tantially the most tragic character in King Lear (and arguably all of the tragedies) due to her innocent and compassionate persona, which rejects the bitterness imposed from being the victim of betrayal and attempts to restore her fathers usurped title.However, the unspeakable act behind a father abandoning his saintly daughter strongly indicates why Shakespeare bestowed Prosper with magic and Lear with madness. Superficially, King Lear and The Tempest both provide many of the elements squired in a revenge plot. Both protagonists are conceptually banished after their royal power is renounced, regardless if the title was robbed from them or relinquished willingly, and desire to restore their former glory. The plays also describe similar scenes of madness experienced by Lear but inflicted by Prosper on secondary characters.Although betrayal and the search for Justice are elements fundamental to the plays plot, neither story qualifies in taking the title of a revenge tragedy. In King L ear, the only character that arguably has a motive for revenge is Edmund for being mocked as an illegitimate child. Lear, the principal character, is responsible for triggering the events of the play by allowing the wicked sisters to rule his kingdom and disown Cornelia. In The Tempest, the magical harpy generated by Prospered magic doesnt qualify as the Vengeful ghost most revenge tragedies would describe.Prosper succeeds in his revenge by restoring his stolen title from Antonio, but expresses mercy and compassion towards his enemies, therefore voiding the play from any tragic genre. Predominantly, the themes illustrated in The Tempest and King Lear project the once for Justice, but the concept behind familial betrayal stem from the protagonists daughters and ultimately receive Judgment from Shakespeare. The component of evil is not entirely absent from The Tempest, as Clinical (the son of the Devil who attempted to rape young Miranda) is undeniably a wicked character.Clinical echo es similarities to Lagos character in Othello, evoking the idea that the Devil mightier had more children scattered throughout the Shakespearean universe. While the Journey for restoration described in King Lear arguably parallels the plot thin The Tempest, the progress actually made by protagonists reveals that the psyche of both men are actually years apart. Prosper is already enjoying the relationship he shares with his daughter at the beginning of his play while Lear doesnt make his revelation until half of the plays events elapse.In fact, Lear is ironically more sane as a madman then he ever was as king. Shakespeare gives the notion that the power behind father-daughter relationship transcends any obstacle hurled towards the protagonist, as described by the victory Prosper achieved after Ewing exiled to a distant island, but the tragedy depicted in King Lear reminds the audience of the grim consequences one must look when turning their back on innocent family. The conclusion o f both plays, Just like their introductions, are described in a reverse fashion.Shakespeare temporarily forgave Lear through compassionate Cornelia, while Prosper exhibited his compassion by forgiving the other characters. Prosper learns compassion through Miranda, a concept that Shakespeare deliberately instilled in Lear when it was too late . If Shakespeare had altered the conclusion in King Lear to an ending where Lear survived the chaos, then t would be plausible to assume his character would exhibit the same characteristics of Prosper two elderly rulers who where once usurped by malicious family and learned the value of compassion through their righteous daughters.Of course, this theoretical concept of King Lear concluding in peace would null the play from its tragic form, and reclassify the drama as a comedy Just like its companion play, The Tempest. Moreover, The elements of a tragedy illustrated in The Tempest are not as blatant as those described in King Lear, if anything, the hamster Lear suffers from is substituted by Prospered wisdom. The element of hope, however, is a strong tragic component that pulsates throughout the veins of both plays. The audience evidently sympathizes with both protagonists, as both elderly men have been more sinned against than sinning. (3. 2. 1372), but Shakespeare ultimately scrutinizes the elderly men through their behavior as fathers-of-celestial women and Judges their fate by either condemning the protagonist to an agonizing death or rewarding him with the honor of restored monarchy and freedom. *Addendum If given the fortunate opportunity to celebrate my 65th birthday, Judging by how I fleet on life the past 24 years, I can certainly see myself remembering Shakespearean work as the key to understanding hamster and the very-real danger it can demonstrate.Aristotle coined the term hamster, but it wasnt until I read Shakespearean Hamlet that I realized the consequences of your internal-flaws. Similar to Hamlet, I used t o have an indecisive personality, (which hasnt completely faded from my subconscious), and I frequently would think- forrader acting and find faux justifications in delaying my goals applying for scholarships, working harder in grade school, daily exercise, healthy dieting, and managing finances.Although I didnt interact with the ghost of my father nor seek revenge against my treacherous uncle, I lost dozens of life-enriching opportunities due to being indecisive and it haunts me frequently. I can only assume, and hope, that the age of 65 will be a milestone for decades of utilizing a revamped proactive persona, as the tragedies will always remind me of the catastrophes that stem from personality flaws. After all, what better way can we pity a tragic figure than to express our own compassion towards their suffering?King LearThe selected passage is from Act IV, Scene VII, from one of the most historical and critically acclaimed plays of William Shakespeare. It is generally a edacity today to be Shakespeares superlative play by the learned as well as the public (Hunter, p. 1). It has the extremes of cruelty and suffering face extremes of loyalty and sacrifice and its basic motifs have the classic themes of love, betrayal, rejection and conquest. Shakespeares audience of the time truly silent these themes, identifying well with the king as a tragic hero and the nihilism that was fast growing its plant in the time of Jacobean theater.In the given passage, the scene is presented between Cordelia and her father. A physician is present as well. Cordelia has just rescued her father who is now battling a profound befuddlement of senses. He is already transmutation in and out of reality, wearing flowers in his hair. After these few dialogues of Cordelia (above passage), he comes to consciousness and once recognizes Cordelia, begins to debate that they are both dead..King Lear, writes Marvin Rosenberg, was written for the stage, to stimulate sense, feeling, and min d in a massive theatrical experience. any(prenominal) evaluation must consider the artists use of all his arousal materials (Rosenberg, p. 1). The emotional turmoil and conflicts of relationships in Lears life make much for the massive theatrical experience that Shakespeare promised.In this given passage, Cordelia beseeches to her sisters, Regan and Goneril, in dramatic agony. They have betrayed their father and brought him to a condition which brings tears to Cordelia. For the sake of greed and land, the two sisters have brought their father humble the very piths of humanity and the one daughter who was actually sincere to Lear is now at his side. Lear, tragically and unfortunately, mistrusted and maltreated this very daughter who was praying unto heavens and doing her utmost to bring her father back to a state of life and revival.Seeing her fathers terrible condition, Cordelia wonders out loud, with ample pathos, to Regan and Goneril that if they had not considered the fact tha t Lear was their father they could have at least considered his age and senility. only when they did not consider it at all and left him to be swallowed by the ill-winds that blew his way with the courtesy of their betrayal itself.Cordelia creates a powerful analogy for the condition of her father and his daughters with the dog of an enemy. She says that even an enemys dog, which has the sole purpose of establishing harm to you would have stood against her or supported her in a terrible fate such as this. But what was this inhumanity of her sisters that they had so deliberately thrown their father into this highly adverse situations where there was no one left to take care of him but the natural state and the rough fate that brought him to Cordelia in such conditions.The character of Cordelia is a paragon of virtue and optimism. Her simple nature is signaled by her label-name, which focuses on her situation. She is a woman of heart, compassion and courage (Hamilton, p. 151). Whe n her father asks her to speak of her love and loyalty and devotion to him, she opens Pandora s Box by replying in her sweet, simple, precise words, Unhappy that I am, I cannot have my heart into my mouth. I love your majesty according to my bond, no more nor less (Shakespeare, p. 12). Her father does not understand the depth of these simple and truthful words and mistakes her simplicity for insincerity. He falls in the ambuscade of slick and suave words that ultimately bring his downfall.As she leaves the home, she speaks on her farewell note with the heartfelt emotion, which again goes unnoticed and dishonored, The jewels of our father, with washd eyes Cordelia leaves you. I know you what you are, and like a sister am most slow to call your faults as they are namd. Love well our father to your professed bosoms I commit him. But yet, alas, stood I wihin his grace, I would prefer him to a better place. So farewell to you both (Shakespeare, p. 19).The foolish king does not understa nd Cordelia and her love and in this passage, where she sits beside him, nursing him, praying for his health, lamenting the selfishness and cruelty of her sisters, we see the same loyal daughter who refused to bear a grudge for a nave, arrogant and narcissistic father who would destroy everything due to his these very follies.There are powerful themes of the play that are duly depicted in this passage. Cordelias love for her father, contempt the way that he treated her, shows her unrelenting and faithfulness to her father. She feels passionately for her fathers drink and vouches all that she possibly can to the Heavens so that he is well soon. This theme and behavior of Cordelia shows that despite Lears pessimism and nihilism for the world and life in general, no matter how justified his circumstances whitethorn be, there is still hope in the world. With people like Cordelia, one could not say the human race is generally bad by nature (Friedlander, n.p.).Some critics also venerate King Lear as a Christian drama with elements of regeneration, redemption and being saved (Elton, p. 3). Although the play itself is a tragedy and the cruelty of the bottomless evil of the notion and nature of mankind is aptly described in the play on various occasions and through various points, but despite all that, through Cordelias character and realistic love for her father, we see that mankind is capable of some good, at least.The passage bears in it a strong message for this very fight between good and evil. The world is, although, not as grandly and starkly divided between dark and white forces, this particular passage in King Lear shows that Cordelia has the passion to hate. It is not as if she is a picture of morality or does not understand evil for the reason of being nave or un-understanding. She is fully aware of what her sisters had in mind and what they meant to happen to their father. But Cordelias true and pure nature helps her ask this question that even if they had forgotten the fact that Lear was their father did they not realize that they were doing this to a man who was at the end of his age? A long and war-filled life that needed to be spent in harmony and peace? Yet his own flesh and blood had forsaken him.Due to his senility, he may not have been able to realize the depth of his mistakes and actions but Cordelia expects from her sisters to understand the senility and care for him and not swindle him into pitch him into this state of despair and dreadfulness. This passage not only depicts the disappointment and despair of a sister, a daughter and a woebegone character, but the symbol of truth and goodness when it faces the turmoil of the chaos that evil and greed have committed in the world, which only produces pain, disaster and tragedy. BibliographyElton, William R. King Lear and the Gods. San Marino, Calif Huntington Library, 1966. Friedlander, Ed. Enjoying King Lear, by William Shakespeare. Pathguy.com. Jan 30, 2005. http//www .pathguy.com/kinglear.htm October 27, 2007. Hamilton, Sharon. Shakespeares Daughters. Jefferson, N.C. McFarland, 2003. Hunter, G., and Shakespeare, William. King Lear. London Penguin Books. 1996. Rosenberg, Marvin. The Masks of King Lear. Berkeley University of California Press, 1972. Shakespeare, William, Barbara A. Mowat, and Paul Werstine. The Tragedy of King Lear. New Folger Library Shakespeare. New York cap Square Press, 2005.King LearIn Shakespeares King Lear there is a definite element of the wondrous as seen in Lears own personality, and the other main characters in how they treat Lear. Thus the tremendous in Shakespeares play is manifested through power. The fanciful theme of Shakespeares play will be examined in this essay as it pertains to King Lears hate of his daughters, and the way in which he treats them in advance his death.Blindness is a recognition in the play of Lears grotesque nature or his need for power over others and how he cannot stand to see the world, or kingdom he created at the end of the play (Friedlander paragraph two). In King Lears distrust of his daughters he one by one makes himself disowned by them as can be deciphered in this speech,I prithee, daughter, do not make me mad. I will not trouble thee, my child farewell. Well no more meet, no more see one another. But yet thou art my flesh, my blood, my daughter Or rather a disease thats in my flesh, Which I must needs call mine. Thou art a boil, A plague sore, an embossed carbuncle In my corrupted blood. But Ill not chide thee. Let shame come when it will, I do not call it. I do not bid the Thunder-bearer shoot zero(prenominal) tell tales of thee to high-judging Jove. Mend when thou canst be better at thy leisure I can be patient, I can stay with Regan, I and my hundred knights. ( Shakespeare II.iv.1514).The parallels of father-child relationships are shown in how Lears daughter, Cordelia, parallels to Gloucesters son Edgar both Cordelia and Edgar are loyal to their fathe rs to the end, and Cordelia is banished while Edgar is forced into hiding both actions are pertaining to the manifestation of the grotesque in King Lear (Friedlander paragraph two). King Lears other two daughters, Goneril and Regan, parallel with Gloucesters son Edmund. Goneril and Regan flatter Lear, Sir, I love you more than words can wield the matter (Shakespeare I. 1. 53-54).The parallels in the deaths of Lear and Gloucester are seen in how both die in the presence of their loyal children Lear dies with Cordelia in his arms, and Gloucester dies after Edgar has revealed himself as the Dukes son thus, although Shakespeare has written the grotesque in the play, he also allows his protagonists a chance of redemption.Moreover, Lear and Gloucester both die in extremes of passion. Lear dies of a broken heart. contribute heart, I prithee break, and Gloucesters flawd heart bursts of joy and grief after his reunification with Edgar (Shakespeare). As well both die with renewed insight Glo ucester needs to be blinded before he can see Edmunds deceit and Edgars loyalty. Lear needs to suffer the rejection of his older daughters before he can see Cordelias loyalty, and men of power find that the loss of title and position humbles them therefore the grotesque found in King Lear is eventually overcome through love (Doran 141).Shakespeares play is based on Britons own King Leir, a tragic story of a king and his relationship with his family. The tragic element of the play harkens to the reality of the time of the writing as well as its history involved in Britain (Friedlander paragraph one). In the quote previously states (I prithee daughter- Shakespeare) there is a strong element of pride, lack of hope, and disease is mentioned.The disease mentioned could be a remark on the overpowering plagues occurring in Britain as well as famine. Thus, the stress in a family relationship would be counted more stressful because of the environmental factors involved in the plays setting. In fact, the theme of hunger, either of love, hope, pride, or greed, runs strong through the entire play, and this is the reason the first quote is so important, it highlights these human elements in the play (West 57).Although the theme of marriage is not as strong in this play there are other themes which comprise the progression of the plot. The theme in King Lear subsists with the child-parent relationship which supercharge develops with Lears three daughters, their submissiveness or lack of submissiveness with their father. In this play the focus of the married daughters who are turn up to be evil and usurpers of their fathers power while the younger daughter, the innocent unmarried one proves to be the only supporter King Lear has although he blindingly distrusts her from act one. The theme of King Lear is suitably that of loyalty from the female class whether in faithfulness or disloyalty.The parallels of greed in political power (another form of the grotesque in Shakespear es play) are presented in how Goneril and Regan seek political power by their ability to strip the King of all his train of followers, by rejecting the Kings title, and turning him out into the storm, entreat him by no means to stay (Shakespeare III. 1. 297). Also, Edmund has high political aspirations by allowing Gloucester to be blinded for his own political gain, attend to him instantly ReganPluck out his eyes Goneril (Shakespeare III. 7. 4-5), and he usurps Edgars legitimate title as the time to come Earl of Gloucester. Furthermore, Kent and Edgar both lose their nobility, the Earl of Kent is banished for his honest defense of Cordelia, and Edgar loses his claim to nobility through the deceit and trickery of Edmund.The conclave between the sub-plot and the main-plot in King Lear comprises of thematically similar plots. Shakespeare has used the characters and themes of the subplot to amplify the drama and calamity of the main plot. With two plots, perfectly intertwined and yet offering parallel lessons, Shakespeare is able to heighten the emotional effect of the tragedy. In conclusion, the subplot intensifies the emotional impact of the main plot in the areas of child-parent relationships, the corruption of political power, and the death of the protagonist (West 58).In the intelligence of identity and love in that identity King Lear is redemptive but full of pat, and still hanging onto pride which presents the issue of love for a woman, albeit a daughter, has not persuasion over self-loathing (Doran 152). Here Shakespeares design in the play portends of how innocence as with Cordelia when followed is prophetic but when love is denied in Shakespeares plays the consequences are dire. In King Lears age he sees himself as beyond the measure of blame because his life is already lived, his deeds are already accomplished. It is with the hope of redemption through love that the play ends King Lear states,Hear me, recreant On thine allegiance, hear me Since thou hast sought to make us break our vow- Which we durst never yet- and with straind pride To come between our sentence and our power,- Which nor our nature nor our place can bear,- Our potency made good, take thy reward. Five days we do allot thee for provision To shield thee from diseases of the world, And on the sixth to turn thy dislike back Upon our kingdom. If, on the tenth day following, Thy banishd trunk be found in our dominions, The moment is thy death. apart By Jupiter, This shall not be revokd (ShakespeareI.i.178ff).It is only with the hope of love, that these characters can be redeemed, and the nature of the grotesque in the play may be wiped out.This essay has delved into the plays inner workings of plot, and sub plot and how each character seems to represent a certain element of the grotesque in human nature through greed, political power, and lack of faith (West 57). It is only through King Lears blindness that this grotesque nature is truly seen since the reason for his blindness is because he cannot bear to see the world he created through his own grotesque nature beginning with doubt of his daughters love.Work CitedDoran, M. The Quarto of King Lear and Brights Shorthand. Modern Philology, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Nov., 1935), pp. 139-157Friedlander, E. Enjoying King Lear. 2005. Online. Retrieved 22 November 2007.http//www.pathguy.com/kinglear.htmShakespeare. King Lear. Penguin Classic. 1998.Theatre History. King Lear. 2002. Online. Retrieved 22 November 2007.http//www.theatrehistory.com/british/kinglear001.htmlWest, R. Sex and Pessimism in King Lear. Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 1. (Winter, 1960), pp. 55-60.King LearPPISMP TESL (R) Foundation Course Cohort 4 (June 2011 Intake) English Studies III PI 1353K (R) (Revision) KING LEAR By William Shakespeare 1. The intricate relationship between characters adds to the interest of readers to study the play. Based on the play you have studied, discuss this statement with convincing evidence to justify your answer. 2. Write a critical analysis of one of the themes presented in the play you have studied. 3. Identify the theme of the play you have studied. Elaborate how the theme is developed by the characters. . Identify the theme of the play you have studied. Elaborate how the plot and the setting develop the theme. 5. Identify one of the issues raised in the play you have studied. characters reflect this issue. Elaborate how the 6. Identify the theme of the play you have studied. Elaborate how the theme is developed by the setting and the characters. 7. Identify the issues raised in the play you have studied. evidence from the text. Discuss the issues with 8. Discuss the significance of the title and how it reflects the theme of the play. .Discuss the significance of the title and how it is developed by the characters and plot of the novel. NHA/ES III King Lear Revision/2012 Themes Greed for power & wealth Betrayal Familial relationship Love & betrayal Issues Greed for power & w ealth destroys Blind love Actions and consequences 10. Based on the drama you have studied, analyze the play based on the following i. The characters ii. The theme iii. The issues raised Support your answer with convincing evidence and elaboration. 1. You have studied a play during this course. Based on this play, write a critical analysis of about 350 words. In your analysis, discuss the themes and issues raised and how these are portrayed by the characters. 12. Write a reader response of about 350 words on the play you have studied. In your reader response, discuss the following i. ii. iii. The theme The characters and their relationships The influence of the setting on the characters NHA/ES III King Lear Revision/2012King LearAlthough a similar vision of justice is encompassed within King Lear and The Tempest, both protagonists receive fate strikingly dissimilar from one another as a direct result of the relationship shared between their respective daughters, which ultimately di stinguishes the plays from the similar concepts (compassion, nature, monarchy, and usurping) found within them. In King Lear, the nature of mercy and redemption are unobtainable elements, as the form of a Shakespearean tragedy is established on the foundation of chaos and pity, which arguably conceals the subtle (or blatant) relationship between both plays.Both plays include a tempest a violent thunderstorm that symbolize a life-changing moment for the introspective protagonists. Prospered magic conjures the violent storm described in The Tempest, which destroys the boat of his royal enemies and prompts the pilot of the play. Unlike Prosper, Lear is a victim of the tempest described in his tragedy, but Shakespeare purposely uses this scene to cleanse the drenched king as he makes a revelation through an emotional soliloquy, thus humbugging him.This concept of natures fury, although mutually significant in both respective plays, also discloses the dissimilarity shared between the tw o protagonists. Prosper, from the opening scene, was described as wise and empathetic, specifically using the storm to confront his enemies, not to cause harm. Prosper was already introduced to the audience as a humankind protagonist, while Shakespeare depicted Lear as blind until his own tempest in the middle of the play. The significance of the tempest scenes symbolizes the genesis of repentance and retribution for both of the principal characters.Although Prosper is successful in restoring his role as the rightful king in the plays climax, Learners kingdom is obliterated and results in his death. The notable nature behind the protagonists paternal role towards their daughter tryingly influences the events of the play, as both elderly kings are fathers to similarly angelic daughters. In King Lear, the audience is quickly clued in on Learners foolishness as a father, since Shakespeare manifests this notion through the old kings retirement celebration.Learners two daughters, General and Reagan, are wicked women who manipulatively express their faux affection towards their narcissistic father. Ironically, Cornelia remains the only daughter of virtue who proclaims that the sincere affection she feels towards him transcends mere words. King Learners opening CT alone already corresponds with the introduction found within The Tempests introduction, except the scenario is presented in a reverse manner.Lear was seeking an early retirement and attempted to distribute his kingdom between his three daughters, while Prosper was usurped of his dukedom by his treacherous younger brother, Antonio. Despite of the similarities presented in the opening act, Shakespeare also reveals the pivotal difference behind the plays father/daughter dynamic. Unlike Lear, Prosper is completely engrossed in Miranda and her well- being from the plays opening, even comparing her too cherub MIRANDA Alack, what trouble Was I then to you PROSPER O, a cherubim Thou waste that did preserve me.Thou didst smile. Infused with a fortitude from heaven. (1. 2. 51-54) Shakespeare arguably uses Miranda for the sole purpose of symbolism, since her characters actions are essentially irrelevant to the events in The Tempest, as shes utilized more as an image of Prospered fatherly love rather than a character of great significance. Cornelia, whose nature is undeniably similar to Miranda, is portrayed as one the most compelling characters in King Lear, due to her role as the angelic daughter who substitutes Marinaras naivety with awareness.Shakespeare exchanges the protagonists role through their daughters in both King Lear and The Tempest Lear exhibits Marinaras naivety and Prosper reflects Cordilleras compassion. Shakespeare distinguishes this concept from the onset of both plays and hints towards the protagonists fate through, once again, their daughters. Prosper established his endearment towards Miranda in the beginning of The Tempest and consistently demonstrated his loyalty towards her. Shakespeare rewards the unconditional love exhibited by the elderly king and compensates the former ruler with a favorable conclusion.In King Lear, the protagonist is not bestowed with the same fortune, as Lear also hints towards his fate during the plays introduction. Lear does not refer to his celestial daughter a cherub, like Prosper did, and chooses to disown his daughter instead LEAR Let it be so. Thy truth then be thy dower. For by the sacred radiance of the sun, The mysteries of Hectare and the night, By all the operation of the orbs From whom we do exist and cease to be-? Here I disclaim all my paternal care, Propinquity, and property of blood, And as a stranger to my heart and me Hold thee from this for ever.The barbarous Scythian, Or he that makes his generation messes To gorge his appetite, shall to my bosom Be as well neighborhood, pitied, and relieved As thou my sometime daughter. (109-123) Truthfully, Lear only disowned his daughter through the sole notion that sh e didnt love him (verbally), but the motive behind this harsh act does not exempt Lear from the grim fate Shakespeare had reserved. A Shakespearean tragedy is molded on the tragic figures hamster, as Learners foolishness was evidently his.Betrayal of kin spreads like poison throughout King Learners conclusion Gloucester, Lear, Reagan, and General all meet their grim fate because of the deception they inflicted on their families. Cornelia is substantially the most tragic character in King Lear (and arguably all of the tragedies) due to her innocent and compassionate persona, which rejects the bitterness imposed from being the victim of betrayal and attempts to restore her fathers usurped title.However, the unspeakable act behind a father abandoning his saintly daughter strongly indicates why Shakespeare bestowed Prosper with magic and Lear with madness. Superficially, King Lear and The Tempest both provide many of the elements squired in a revenge plot. Both protagonists are conceptu ally banished after their royal power is renounced, regardless if the title was robbed from them or relinquished willingly, and desire to restore their former glory. The plays also describe similar scenes of madness experienced by Lear but inflicted by Prosper on secondary characters.Although betrayal and the search for Justice are elements fundamental to the plays plot, neither story qualifies in taking the title of a revenge tragedy. In King Lear, the only character that arguably has a motive for revenge is Edmund for being mocked as an illegitimate child. Lear, the principal character, is responsible for triggering the events of the play by allowing the wicked sisters to rule his kingdom and disown Cornelia. In The Tempest, the magical harpy generated by Prospered magic doesnt qualify as the Vengeful ghost most revenge tragedies would describe.Prosper succeeds in his revenge by restoring his stolen title from Antonio, but expresses mercy and compassion towards his enemies, theref ore voiding the play from any tragic genre. Predominantly, the themes illustrated in The Tempest and King Lear project the once for Justice, but the concept behind familial betrayal stem from the protagonists daughters and ultimately receive Judgment from Shakespeare. The component of evil is not entirely absent from The Tempest, as Clinical (the son of the Devil who attempted to rape young Miranda) is undeniably a wicked character.Clinical echoes similarities to Lagos character in Othello, evoking the idea that the Devil mightier had more children scattered throughout the Shakespearean universe. While the Journey for restoration described in King Lear arguably parallels the plot thin The Tempest, the progress actually made by protagonists reveals that the psyche of both men are actually years apart. Prosper is already enjoying the relationship he shares with his daughter at the beginning of his play while Lear doesnt make his revelation until half of the plays events elapse.In fact , Lear is ironically more sane as a madman then he ever was as king. Shakespeare gives the notion that the power behind father-daughter relationship transcends any obstacle hurled towards the protagonist, as described by the victory Prosper achieved after Ewing exiled to a distant island, but the tragedy depicted in King Lear reminds the audience of the grim consequences one must face when turning their back on innocent family. The conclusion of both plays, Just like their introductions, are described in a reverse fashion.Shakespeare temporarily forgave Lear through compassionate Cornelia, while Prosper exhibited his compassion by forgiving the other characters. Prosper learns compassion through Miranda, a concept that Shakespeare deliberately instilled in Lear when it was too late . If Shakespeare had altered the conclusion in King Lear to an ending where Lear survived the chaos, then t would be plausible to assume his character would exhibit the same characteristics of Prosper two elderly rulers who where once usurped by malicious family and learned the value of compassion through their righteous daughters.Of course, this theoretical concept of King Lear concluding in peace would null the play from its tragic form, and reclassify the drama as a comedy Just like its companion play, The Tempest. Moreover, The elements of a tragedy illustrated in The Tempest are not as blatant as those described in King Lear, if anything, the hamster Lear suffers from is substituted by Prospered wisdom. The element of hope, however, is a strong tragic component that pulsates throughout the veins of both plays. The audience evidently sympathizes with both protagonists, as both elderly men have been more sinned against than sinning. (3. 2. 1372), but Shakespeare ultimately scrutinizes the elderly men through their behavior as fathers-of-celestial women and Judges their fate by either condemning the protagonist to an agonizing death or rewarding him with the honor of restored mona rchy and freedom. *Addendum If given the fortunate opportunity to celebrate my 65th birthday, Judging by how I fleet on life the past 24 years, I can certainly see myself remembering Shakespearean work as the key to understanding hamster and the very-real danger it can demonstrate.Aristotle coined the term hamster, but it wasnt until I read Shakespearean Hamlet that I realized the consequences of your internal-flaws. Similar to Hamlet, I used to have an indecisive personality, (which hasnt completely faded from my subconscious), and I frequently would think-before acting and find faux justifications in delaying my goals applying for scholarships, working harder in grade school, daily exercise, healthy dieting, and managing finances.Although I didnt interact with the ghost of my father nor seek revenge against my treacherous uncle, I lost dozens of life-enriching opportunities due to being indecisive and it haunts me frequently. I can only assume, and hope, that the age of 65 will be a milestone for decades of utilizing a revamped proactive persona, as the tragedies will always remind me of the catastrophes that stem from personality flaws. After all, what better way can we pity a tragic figure than to express our own compassion towards their suffering?